Can machines think?
Alan Turing, in the journal Mind, UK
Turing suggested a test: if a machine's typed answers cannot be told apart from a person's, we should take its thinking seriously. The question framed the next 76 years.
- ATAlan Turing
- Mind
The history of artificial intelligence, 1950 to October 2026
In 1950 Alan Turing asked whether machines could think. Scroll down and watch the answer grow: 8 fields branching and merging, two winters when the money froze, and the people who kept going.
Fields on screen Pick one to follow it
Chapter 11950 to 1973
A few researchers bet that thinking could be written down as steps a machine could follow.
Alan Turing, in the journal Mind, UK
Turing suggested a test: if a machine's typed answers cannot be told apart from a person's, we should take its thinking seriously. The question framed the next 76 years.
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, USA
Four researchers proposed that every part of learning could be described precisely enough for a machine to copy it. John McCarthy's name for the new field stuck: artificial intelligence.
Frank Rosenblatt, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, USA
The perceptron adjusted its own connections until it could sort punch cards marked on the left from those marked on the right. It is the seed of today's neural networks.
Arthur Samuel, IBM, USA
Samuel's checkers program got better by playing against itself, and his 1959 paper used the phrase machine learning. Learning instead of hand-written rules would win, decades later.
Joseph Weizenbaum, MIT, USA
ELIZA matched keywords and turned your words back into questions, like a therapist. People felt understood anyway, which troubled its own creator.
Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert, USA
Their book Perceptrons proved what simple one-layer networks could never learn. Interest and money drifted towards rule-based AI.
Alain Colmerauer and Philippe Roussel, Marseille, France
In Prolog you write down facts and rules, and the computer works out the answers. It became a favourite tool of rule-based AI, especially in Europe and Japan.
James Lighthill, for the UK Science Research Council
The report judged that AI had failed its grand promises, and Britain cut most university AI funding. With US cuts close behind, the first winter set in.
Chapter 2About 1974 to 1980
About 1974 to 1980, though historians draw the lines differently. Big promises met small computers, and Britain and the US cut funding. Research slowed but never stopped.
No landmark in these years. Funding was thin, but the ideas kept moving in a few labs.
Chapter 31980 to 1986
AI went to work as long lists of if-then rules, written down from human experts.
Kunihiko Fukushima, Japan
Modelled on the brain's visual system, the neocognitron spotted simple strokes first, then the shapes built from them. It inspired the convolutional networks that read images today.
John McDermott, Carnegie Mellon, for DEC, USA
XCON used hand-written rules, about 2,500 in the end, to put together computer orders, and DEC estimated it saved around $25 million a year. Companies rushed to bottle expertise as rules.
MITI and ICOT, Japan
A national project, planned for ten years, set out to build parallel machines for logic-based AI. It advanced the research but missed its commercial goals, and closed in 1994.
ReadSymbolic AI
John Hopfield, in PNAS, USA
Hopfield showed that a network could store patterns and rebuild a whole one from a damaged piece. It helped bring neural networks back, and in 2024 Hopfield shared the Nobel Prize in Physics.
ReadNeural network
David Rumelhart, Geoffrey Hinton and Ronald Williams, in Nature
Their paper showed how to train networks with hidden layers by passing each error backwards through them. The maths was older, from Seppo Linnainmaa in Finland and Paul Werbos in the US; this paper made it famous.
Chapter 4About 1987 to 1993
About 1987 to 1993; some say it lasted longer. The rules boom went bust, yet a few people kept teaching networks to learn.
The AI hardware industry, mostly USA
The market for special Lisp machines collapsed as cheaper desktop computers caught up, and expert systems proved costly and brittle. A second winter began.
Yann LeCun and colleagues, AT&T Bell Labs, USA
LeNet learned to read zip codes straight from pictures, trained with backpropagation. Later versions read about one in ten US cheques by 2001.
ReadConvolutional neural networkImage recognitionBackpropagation
Gerald Tesauro, IBM Research, USA
TD-Gammon played itself over and over, learning from each win and loss, and reached strong master level. Top players copied some of its moves.
Chapter 51994 to 2011
Instead of writing the rules by hand, let the machine find the patterns in examples.
Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik, in Machine Learning
Support vector machines, and random forests soon after, worked well on modest computers and came with well-understood maths. For years, methods like these did most of machine learning's practical work.
IBM Deep Blue against Garry Kasparov, New York
Deep Blue won the rematch 3.5 to 2.5. It could check about 200 million chess positions a second.
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber, in Neural Computation
Long short-term memory let a network keep track of things it saw many steps earlier. In the mid-2010s it powered voice typing, Google Translate and Siri.
Geoffrey Hinton, Simon Osindero and Yee-Whye Teh
They trained deep networks one layer at a time, which made many-layered networks practical again. It helped the phrase deep learning catch on.
Fei-Fei Li and team, Princeton, USA
ImageNet grew to over 14 million images in more than 20,000 categories, labelled by 49,000 online workers in 167 countries. Vision models finally had a big, shared test.
IBM Watson, USA
Watson beat the quiz show's two greatest champions by searching huge amounts of text for likely answers. Computers could now handle questions in everyday English.
Apple, from an SRI International spin-out, USA
Siri arrived built into the iPhone 4S, so millions could ask a phone questions out loud. It grew out of a US defence research project on digital assistants.
Chapter 62012 to 2016
Big datasets, gaming chips and old ideas about neural networks finally clicked.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever and Geoffrey Hinton, University of Toronto, Canada
AlexNet, trained on graphics chips, cut the ImageNet error rate to about 15%, against 26% for the next best entry. Vision research switched to deep learning soon after.
Tomas Mikolov and team, Google, USA
Word2vec turned each word into a list of numbers, so words with similar meanings sit close together. That idea, the embedding, sits inside every language model today.
Volodymyr Mnih and team, DeepMind
It learned to play straight from the pixels on screen, beating a human expert on three of seven games. Deep learning and trial-and-error learning had joined up.
Ian Goodfellow and team, Université de Montréal, Canada
One network forges examples while the other tries to catch the fakes, and both get better. GANs led to strikingly realistic made-up faces, and later to deepfakes.
Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho and Yoshua Bengio, Bremen and Montreal
Their translation model learned which words of the original to focus on for each word it wrote. The trick, called attention, became the heart of the transformer.
Kaiming He and team, Microsoft Research Asia, China
Shortcut connections let signals skip past layers, so networks with more than a hundred layers could learn. ResNet won the 2015 ImageNet challenge, and its shortcuts are now used almost everywhere.
DeepMind, owned by Google, match in Seoul, South Korea
AlphaGo won 4 to 1, helped in game two by a move experts first took for a mistake. More than 200 million people watched.
Chapter 72017 to 2021
One new design for reading text, and then a race to make models bigger.
Ashish Vaswani and seven co-authors, Google
The transformer dropped word-by-word reading and let every word look at every other word at once, which suits fast parallel chips. Almost every large language model since is built on it.
OpenAI, USA
OpenAI's first GPT read lots of unlabelled text to learn language in general, then was fine-tuned for each task. This recipe, pre-training, is how chat models start life.
Jacob Devlin and team, Google, USA
BERT read text both ways to understand each word from its whole sentence. From 2019 it helped Google Search understand what people meant.
OpenAI, USA
GPT-3 had 175 billion parameters and could pick up new tasks from a few examples in the prompt. Earlier that year, scaling laws showed that more data, compute and size improve models predictably.
ReadScaling lawsParametersFew-shot promptingLarge language model
John Jumper, Demis Hassabis and team, DeepMind, London
At the CASP14 contest it predicted how proteins fold from their chain of building blocks, a problem biology had faced for 50 years. It led to the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
OpenAI, USA
DALL-E, a 12 billion parameter cousin of GPT-3, drew images from written descriptions. Words and pictures started to share one model.
Chapter 82022 to 2023
AI stopped being a lab project and became an app on hundreds of millions of phones.
Midjourney, USA; Stable Diffusion, from LMU Munich, Runway and Stability AI
Midjourney opened its beta in July, and in August Stable Diffusion published its weights so anyone could run it on a home graphics card. Both start from noise and clean it up, step by step, into a picture.
ReadDiffusion modelStable DiffusionMidjourneyOpen-weight model
OpenAI, USA
A chat window on a GPT-3.5 model, tuned with human feedback, reached a million users in five days.
Meta AI
LLaMA came in sizes from 7 to 65 billion parameters, small enough for university labs to run. It set off a wave of open-weight models anyone could study and adapt.
OpenAI's GPT-4, as Anthropic's Claude and Google's Bard arrive
GPT-4 took pictures as well as text, and OpenAI reported a top 10% score on a simulated bar exam. The same month Claude and Bard opened, and chatbots became a crowded field.
Mistral AI, Paris, France
Founded that April by researchers from Google DeepMind and Meta, Mistral released a 7 billion parameter model under a licence free for any use. Strong models no longer came only from US giants.
Google DeepMind
Gemini was trained on text, code, images, audio and video together from the start. It came in three sizes, down to one that runs on a phone.
Chapter 92024 to now
Models learned to reason, to use tools and computers, and to work through whole tasks.
OpenAI, USA
Sora's preview made realistic clips up to a minute long from a written prompt. Video models spread fast, though OpenAI itself closed the Sora app in April 2026.
OpenAI's o1, then Google, DeepSeek and others
Trained with reinforcement learning to work through a chain of thought, o1 solved about 74% of a hard maths contest's problems where GPT-4o solved about 12%, by OpenAI's count. Reasoning became the new frontier.
Physics and Chemistry, Stockholm
Physics went to John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton for the foundations of neural networks. Half of Chemistry went to Demis Hassabis and John Jumper for AlphaFold, the other half to David Baker.
Anthropic's Claude, then OpenAI's Operator in January 2025
Claude could look at a screen, move the cursor, click and type, though at first it was slow and made mistakes. Agents could now work inside apps built for people.
Anthropic; since December 2025, the Linux Foundation's Agentic AI Foundation
The Model Context Protocol gave AI apps one standard way to connect to files, apps and data. A year on it had over 10,000 public servers and moved to a neutral foundation.
DeepSeek, Hangzhou, China
R1 came close to the leading reasoning models on maths and coding tests, and came with open weights. Its app topped the US App Store, and Nvidia's share price fell about 17% in a day.
Anthropic's Claude Code, OpenAI's Codex and others
In February Anthropic previewed Claude Code and Andrej Karpathy coined vibe coding: describe what you want, and let the AI write it. Agents like Claude Code, and OpenAI's Codex soon after, read a codebase, edit files, run tests and fix their own errors.
Google DeepMind and OpenAI, IMO 2025
An advanced Gemini solved five of six problems, writing its proofs in natural language within the 4.5 hour limit, and IMO coordinators graded it gold. Two days earlier OpenAI had reported a gold-level score for an experimental model, graded by former medallists rather than officially.
OpenClaw, from Austria; Anthropic's Cowork
OpenClaw, an open-source agent you message from chat apps, had about 247,000 GitHub stars by March, and Anthropic's Cowork brought agents to office work. Security experts warned about agents holding the keys to email and files.
India AI Impact Summit, Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi
88 countries and international organisations endorsed the New Delhi Declaration on AI Impact, which calls for sharing AI's benefits widely. Bengaluru start-up Sarvam showed 30 and 105 billion parameter models with support for Indian languages.
Anthropic's Project Glasswing, with partners across tech
Anthropic said Claude Mythos Preview had found thousands of serious security flaws, including one hidden in OpenBSD for 27 years. It gave the model only to partners defending key software, instead of releasing it publicly.
DeepSeek, Hangzhou, China
DeepSeek previewed V4 with open weights and room for up to a million tokens of context, enough for several long books at once. Its largest version, V4 Pro, has 1.6 trillion parameters.
Google's Gemini 4 Argon, via its Fairwind Program
On 30 September Google gave its newest frontier model to vetted cyber defenders first, to refine its guardrails, then made it generally available on 13 October. In April Anthropic had kept Claude Mythos Preview to security partners.
The whole map
55 moments, 8 fields, two winters. Some lines merged into others, some went quiet, and the newest ones are still being drawn. Tap any dot to jump back to its moment.
Each chip on the timeline opens a plain-words page with its own picture. Start anywhere.
Checked October 2026. Every date, name and organisation here was checked against the original paper, the organisation's own announcement or a standard reference. Historians date the two AI winters differently, so treat those years as approximate.